Sorghum Tips

Ensuring Later-Planted Sorghum Growers have Sugarcane Aphid Resources

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,


Ensuring Later-Planted Sorghum Growers have Sugarcane Aphid Resources

For grain sorghum planted since mid-April in the Concho Valley, North Texas, and the High Plains, the good news is that it appears the downstate reports of sugarcane aphid are still well distant.  The longer this remains the better.  For this planted sorghum as well as forthcoming High Plains sorghum the “First Things” SCA information from Texas A&M AgriLife entomologists are below.  Though you may be concerned about cost of treatment—and these management guidelines emphasize the need for treatment when thresholds are met—you can reduce the potential that those costs spin out of control (money you spend on another spray; the money you lose on a damaged crop) by appropriate scouting and timely spraying.  One of our High Plains AgriLife Extension IPM agents, Kerry Siders (Hockley/Cochran/Lamb Counties) has noted “A good first shot can eliminate the need for a second spray.”

  • Current SCA control recommendations from AgriLife Extension entomology colleagues.  This includes the “Scout Card” at (recommendations unchanged from 2016).  There has been a move within AgriLife to reduce the aphid thresholds downstate to the lower SCA numbers in line with High Plains recommendations.
  • Texas Sugarcane Aphid News blog at  Of particular interest on the blog, scroll down to the Feb. 20, 2017 entry which lists 9 AgriLife videos (41 minutes total) pertaining to all aspects of SCA.  I highly recommend all sorghum producers in the High Plains take an hour to view these.
  • Other SCA and sorghum insect management info. is found at,

Scouting for Sugarcane Aphids

This tip was provided by:

Ronnie Schnell, Cropping Systems – Statewide, College Station,

South and Central Texas

Scouting for Sugarcane Aphids

Sugarcane aphids are currently found in many sorghum fields in the southern and coastal areas of Texas. The distribution of the aphid is expanding north into central Texas. Sugarcane aphid distribution is being tracked at: This map shows where the aphid has been detected but not the level of infestation.

Many fields have been sprayed in the Rio Grande Valley and Coastal Bend. Some fields in the upper Gulf coast are reaching threshold and will require treatment. It is important to scout frequently and thoroughly once aphids are detected. Recommended scouting methods differ for south and central Texas compared to the High Plains region of Texas. Specific recommendations can be found at:

When scouting, make sure to identify the aphid. Yellow sugarcane aphid, corn leaf aphids or greenbugs may be present. Thresholds and control methods will differ for these pests compared to sugarcane aphids. If chemical control of sugarcane aphids is needed, keep in mind pre-harvest intervals and spray restrictions. Transform cannot be used from 3 days pre-bloom until after seed set.

If you have planted hybrids with resistance or tolerance to sugarcane aphids, keep in mind that the hybrid is not immune to sugarcane aphids and needs to be scouted. Sugarcane aphid populations may take more time to reach economic threshold, if at all.

West Texas & Early Planting to Minimize Potential Sugarcane Aphid Impact

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,

West Texas

West Texas & Early Planting to Minimize Potential Sugarcane Aphid Impact

United Sorghum Checkoff Program agronomist Dr. Brent Bean notes caution about planting grain sorghum too early.  Producers by now across Texas have heard from AgriLife entomologists to “plant outside the normal” window, which is primarily “plant early” to reduce your potential exposure to sugarcane aphid, especially when plants are at the vulnerable seedling stage.  That stage-of-growth vulnerability should be partially covered by recommended insecticide seed treatments.

Dr. Bean notes that early planting is not without question.  Yes, you can plant too early thus grain sorghum is slow to germinate, slow to emerge, and may not provide you the protection you expected.

“There are reasons why optimum planting dates for sorghum exist, and these should not be ignored.  Optimum planting dates are based on soil temperature, timing of seasonal rainfall and daily maximum temperatures, risk of insect infestation, and length of growing season,” Dr. Bean notes.

In the High Plains region over the years, millions of dryland sorghum acres have been planted after May and June rainfall.  The outcome is May-June rainfall charges deep soil moisture then September rains (the second wettest month of the year in most West Texas counties) carry the crop through to maturity.

Grain Sorghum Germination and Soil Temperature

Again Dr. Bean notes, “One of the first considerations for early planting should be soil temperature.  The cooler the temperature the slower the sorghum will germinate and emerge.  Most agronomists suggest waiting to plant sorghum until the minimum daily soil temperature is 60°F (usually 2-4” depth) and the forecast for the next 10 days is for warm weather.”  Slightly cooler temperatures may be sufficient provided the weather is clearly warming.

How does the above sorghum germination temperature compare to cotton?  The optimum planting target for cotton is a 10-day average soil temperature (not minimum) of 65°F at the 8-inch depth.  Sixty degrees for sorghum is likely a more shallow temperature, and that is a minimum.  A 4” depth, there is some daily fluctuation, but this would point to an initial sorghum planting temperature that is probably 7-10 days earlier than cotton.

Another safeguard against too-early grain sorghum planting:  do not plant grain sorghum any earlier—regardless of soil temperature—than the point which is two weeks after your last average 32°F temperature.  So, if your county’s last 32°F is April 3 (Dawson Co.) then do not plant sorghum any sooner than April 17—BUT ONLY IF soil temperatures are adequate (the West Texas Mesonet reports the Lamesa April 13 bare soil temperature minimum at 4” is 61°F, but that could be due to April 12 rains).

Here are these last average 32°F dates for selected West Texas counties:

Tom Green, March 28               Yoakum, April 5                        Gray, April 13

Taylor, March 24                        Lubbock, April 6                       Moore, April 18

Wilbarger, March 30                 Swisher, April 14                       Ochiltree, April 25

Collingsworth, April 1                Bailey, April 17                          Dallam, April 23

Dawson, April 3                          Deaf Smith, April 19

So, early sorghum planting to minimize potential exposure to SCA is probably not worth the risk a poor or slow growing stand.  Companies may have hybrids that have tolerance of cooler soils, but then you may lose proven yield potential and/or your possible SCA tolerance in the hybrid.

Early planting may also reduce the risk of other insect damage. In most regions, headworms and midge issues are much less with early planting.  From a SCA management standpoint this is important because many of the insecticides used for these two pests will cause SCA populations to flare.

In summary, Dr. Bean notes early planting of sorghum for managing SCA is an effective IPM tool and should be considered.  “However, do not disregard sound sorghum agronomic practices. Simply moving the planting date up by a couple of weeks can make a significant difference in managing SCA.”

Planting Grain Sorghum: II. In-row Spacing

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,


Planting Grain Sorghum:  II. In-row Spacing

In a previous Sorghum Tip, I discussed row spacing (see Feb. 20, 2017).  Now what about spacing of seeds within the row?

On this smaller scale of about two to six inches within the row, it may seem that the uniformity of spacing is not that important.  Yes, it is true that the root system, for example, will basically still explore the same area and leaf area will be about the same.  Some hybrids, though, do respond differently to spacing around the individual plant with more tillering than others.  This can be a positive effect (a plant accounts for extra space and yield potential by tillering to compensate for a gap in the row) and negative (excess tillering is not desirable in moisture-limited production).   Research beginning in the early 2000s from Dr. Bobby Stewart’s program at West Texas A&M demonstrated that for West Texas dryland conditions suppression of tillering by placing 4 to 6 seeds (thus subsequent plants) within 1.5” or less would essentially eliminate tillering.  Resulting yields tended to be higher (the plant does not direct resources into unproductive tillers) than uniform spacing, but the potential for less shading of soil of clumped plants may lead to more weeds and higher evaporation of soil moisture.

Still having uniform spacing with the row is a plus.  We are most immediately concerned about larger gaps of 12” or more—they are obvious, especially if you are planting 3 to 6 seeds per foot of row.  But the same principle applies like I discussed in row spacing, uniformly distributed plants is favorable.

The faster you plant on rough ground you will also lose incrementally some of your uniform spacing in the seed drop.  I am not the first one to advise producers to “slow down” when you are planting.

I have already planted my grain sorghum.  I will consider this next year…

Actually, when your crop is young, it is a good time to evaluate the stands you have in individual rows.  Do you have skips?  Do you have a row that looks thick?  Or thin?  Usually you can tell from the tractor tire track ribs which direction the planter was moving so you know which row unit of the planter may have thickly or thinly seeded row.  The planter unit needs to be checked for a malfunction.  If you are using a plate planter you can’t expect quite the uniform spacing (or even favorable control of seed drop), but for planters that meter seed in an air-vacuum system, you should expect all rows to very closely drop the same number of seed.  And if you see a row that departs from the general appearance, you need to check that planter unit.

Planter Unit Seed Drop Confirmation

In testing on a late model John Deere 8-row planter at one of our AgriLife research facilities, I found that two rows dropped 17% or more seed than they should have, and one rows was -20% from what was targeted.  Pending the production conditions this creates a potentially non-agronomic plant population.  I recommend that farmers, once they have their seed on hand for grain sorghum—or any other crop—set the planter up, turn the drive wheel a set distance and catch seed to calculate the number of seeds per foot.  How does this match with your planter book?  In this case, a correction can be made before you go to the field, otherwise you await the stand to see if one of your planter units may be off.  For an individual row with the seeding rate off, that is like having the whole field at that population in that row.  You have too many or too few plants.  It needs to be corrected.

Sugarcane Aphid Management Suggestions & Resources

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,

Texas High Plains

Sugarcane Aphid Management Suggestions & Resources

This edition of Sorghum Tips deals with SCA management in the Texas High Plains.  The information may also be relevant for the Concho Valley and Rolling Plains, though the information presented here was not developed in those regions.  There are differences in the High Plains recommendations vs. what we published in the March 3, 2016 Sorghum Tips for South & Central Texas (see for Extension’s Dr. Robert Bowling’ comments).

Instead of reproducing here the details of current SCA recommendations for Texas High Plains grain sorghum, I refer you to the direct writings of Texas A&M AgriLife Extension’s High Plains entomology group led by Dr. Pat Porter, Lubbock.  Consult the Texas Sugarcane Aphid News blog at  The March 2 posting is the first installment of advice with the topics:

  • Sugarcane aphid will most likely return at some level for renewed infestation of High Plains grain sorghum, so be prepared and plan for it.
  • Beneficial insects cleaned up the overwintering aphids in 2016, but what does this mean (or not mean) for 2017?  Read about early observations on the level of current beneficial insects observed in wheat.
  • What about 2017?  Certainly, early planting remains a primary consideration.  Late planting in 2015 was also a good strategy, but that didn’t hold in 2016.
  • Seed treatments are cheap insurance.  It appears that 45 days of protection can be obtained with neonicotinoid seed treatments.  This is especially helpful for seedling sorghum, but all sorghum regardless when planted, should use this strategy.
  • “Resistant” or “Tolerant” grain sorghum hybrids are still susceptible.  No grain sorghum hybrids have been shown to be able to keep SCA numbers below treatment thresholds, but they can slow the rate of SCA population increase.  All of these hybrids require scouting.
  • Additional information for SCA will be posted to the Sugarcane Aphid Network blog soon for the Texas High Plains.  Further topics will include initial treatment thresholds, insecticide rates and efficacy, and economic thresholds for a potential second spray.  Remember, High Plains SCA thresholds are lower than South Texas based on research to date.

Sugarcane Aphid Management Videos for the Texas High Plains

The Texas A&M AgriLife Extension entomologist team working on grain sorghum (Porter, Bynum, Reed Kesheimer) posted nine videos ranging from 3 to 8 minutes in their February 20 update.  See them all at  Topics include early planting, “resistant” hybrids, thresholds, timing, insecticides to prevent sticky harvest issues, SCA effects on forage stalk quality, etc.

Sugarcane Aphid: Update, Outlook, and Early Season Thoughts on Management

This tip was provided by:

Robert Bowling, Extension Entomology, Corpus Christi, (316) 946-0329,

South Texas

Sugarcane Aphid: Update, Outlook, and Early Season Thoughts on Management

Sugarcane aphid is building populations on overwintering hosts from the Lower Rio Grande Valley up through the Coastal Bend of Texas.  Dry conditions and unusually high temperatures in the Valley have allowed farmers to get a big jump on seeding the 2017 sorghum crop.  Sorghum seeded early in February has emerged and conditions are favorable for rapid growth—also favorable for an early-season infestation by SCA.  This may be a harbinger of things to come for south Texas sorghum producers.

It is too early to say with certainty SCA will pose more an issue for sorghum producers in the Valley (and for south Texas) in 2017 than in 2016, but it is always a good idea to scout sorghum early and often for early aphid detection.  An insecticide seed treatment will provide approximately 30 to 50 days of protection from the planting date against SCA.  Start monitoring sorghum about three weeks after planting for early detection of SCA, for early season infestations which usually start on field edges especially where overwintering hosts such as volunteer sorghum or Johnsongrass are present. Always check field borders for SCA.

Many sorghum producers are moving toward sorghum hybrids with ‘high tolerance’ to sugarcane aphid.  Many of these hybrids in multi-state university testing programs have demonstrated their value when compared to an SCA susceptible hybrid.  Sugarcane aphids can be found on ‘highly tolerant’ sorghum hybrids, but their population growth is much slower than growth on susceptible hybrids.  Regardless, all sorghum should be routinely scouted for SCA.  Check with your seed rep before purchasing any sorghum hybrid.  They will have the knowledge of each product’s performance potential and placement not only within a region but within fields on your farm.  A list of sorghum hybrids for 2017 that have been identified as having sugarcane aphid tolerance is posted by United Sorghum Checkoff Program, (From the 2016 list of 21 hybrids, 15 remain, six have been deleted, and 12 new hybrids were added for 2017, as of Feb. 28.)

Keep in mind that you are paid on pounds of grain produced and not the tolerance of your hybrid to sugarcane aphid.  We would not suggest abandoning a high performing SCA susceptible hybrid for an unproven hybrid with SCA tolerance.  Remember that SCA management is highly dependent on early detection and routine weekly or twice weekly scouting to treat when populations reach an economic threshold of 50 to 125 aphids per leaf (average of sampled plants; remember, this is a South Texas threshold, the threshold for the High Plains is lower).  Treatment must be applied within 3 to 5 days of reaching a threshold to prevent populations from reaching economically damaging levels.  Remember that carrier volume is extremely important to maximize penetration of the insecticide into the canopy (10-15 gallons/A by ground and 5 gallons/A by air).

Fungal Infection of Sugarcane Aphid, South Texas, 2016

I recently wrote about an epizootic fungus occurring in an insecticide efficacy trial in 2016 which colonized sugarcane aphids.  The fungus responsible was Lecanicillium lecanii.  Is this possibly a means of managing SCA?  Although epizootic fungi are highly effective for SCA (and other pests) management, their occurrence is very dependent on very specific parameters.  At this time, our observations on this fungus are limited to a small area of Texas in 2016.  It remains to be seen if it will be present let alone have an impact on Texas sorghum in 2017.  Currently, it is not clear if the fungus could be managed by producers for control of SCA.  For further reading on the fungus, see newsletters 1.7 & 2.1 at

For more information on sugarcane aphid and other sorghum pests in South Texas please visit our website at

Planting Grain Sorghum: I. Row Spacing Width

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,


Planting Grain Sorghum:  I. Row Spacing Width

The average Texas grain sorghum field has narrower row spacing than 20 and 30 years ago.  The impetus to do so incudes better understanding of plant growth response, improved sorghum shading of the soil for reducing evaporation and suppressing small weeds, more conservation tillage, and in some cases the desire to push for higher yields with more uniformly spaced plants.  And finally, when sorghum producers (as well as corn, cotton, and other crops) push for higher yields there is a common belief that higher plant populations may enable you to realize that most years.  But as any Texas farmer knows, weather varies from year to year, and a crop will not respond the same way each year.  Higher plant populations can limit your sorghum’s ability to respond to environment, especially rainfall.

Whether a farmer moves from 40” rows to 30” rows in the High Plains, from 36” or 38” rows to 30” in South Texas, or to 15” or 20” row spacing anywhere in the state, there is tendency to increase seed drop thus resulting in a higher population.  I tend to believe this increased seed drop is a neutral to negative effect in most Texas sorghum fields because many farmers are in fact already at the upper end—or beyond—what seed drop they should be using (see below where to get AgriLife suggestions).  I recommend that farmers initially do not increase seed drop when they reduce row spacing width.  Instead, let the more uniform spacing of plants in the field be your friend and potentially increase your yield.  That alone is likely an improvement in agronomic practices.

I will cover in-row spacing in a future Sorghum Tip.

What if I am drilling my grain sorghum?
Some Texas sorghum farmers, at least in the High Plains, may even drill their grain sorghum.  Compared to 30” rows or even 40” rows, should they increase their grain sorghum seeding rate?  I usually say ‘no.’  First, it is hard to set drills to plant a targeted seed drop.  They are designed to plant seed in volume, like wheat.  You may not be able to get a sorghum seeding rate low enough without taping off 1 in 3 drill rows, or even 1 in 2 drill rows.  Again, let the spacing of your seed and the subsequent plant be your friend.  I will concede, though, a 10% increase in seeding rate if drilling due to the inferior ability of a drill to place seed like a planter does.  If the ground is rough and thus seedbed planting conditions are less than desirable, I might increase seeding rate 20%, but know that if you get the rain you hoped for, all the seed could germinate, and you are immediately overpopulated.

What grain sorghum seeding rates should I be using?
In some areas of the state we truly don’t have good data, or it may be 30 or more years old.  We don’t discount the data from the distant past, but as hybrids have changed some, tillering ability may be different, etc. it would be good if AgriLife could bring you recent multi-year and multi-site data for each region of the state.  For our current general suggestions see the United Sorghum Checkoff Program pocket grain sorghum production guides at  There are three editions that cover Texas (South & Central Texas; South Plains/Concho Valley/Rolling Plains (the West Texas edition), and a third edition that covers the Texas Panhandle.  The former two guides were prepared by Texas A&M AgriLife staff, the Panhandle edition was a joint effort between Texas A&M and Kansas State.

Preplant and Preemerge Herbicide Options in Grain Sorghum

This tip was provided by:

Ronnie Schnell, Cropping Systems – Statewide, College Station,


Preplant and Preemerge Herbicide Options in Grain Sorghum

Early competition from broadleaf and grass weeds in grain sorghum can result in yield loss. Use of soil active herbicides applied before planting or before sorghum emergence is critical for effective weed management. Below is a partial list of herbicide options and approximate cost at low and high labeled rates. Prices are for planning purposes only. Actual cost may vary. Always read and follow label directions for specific rates and timing. EPPS = early preplant surface, SPPI = shallow preplant incorporate, PRE = after planting but before crop emergence.

  1. atrazine – (AAtrex, Atrazine 4L)                                                                           $5-10/A
  • 1-4 pts/A, PRE only (TX Gulf Coast & Blacklands only)
  • Lower rates (1-2.5 pts/A) for Pigweed control in other regions.
  • Supplemental Label can be found at:
  • Good control of broadleaves and some grasses.
  • Do not apply to coarse textured soils or soil with less than 1% organic matter.
  • Be aware of rotation restrictions.
  1. saflufenacil (Sharpen)                                                                                             $6-14/A
  • 1-2 oz/A EPPS or PRE
  • Burndown herbicide with some residual activity
  • Good activity on broadleaves.
  • 2-4 weeks of residual, some hybrids may be sensitive.
  1. dimethenamid-p – (Outlook, Establish)                                                                   $11-23/A
  • 12-21 oz/A based on soil texture, EPPS, SPPI, PRE
    • Seed Safener (Concep) Required.
    • Good control of grass and broadleaf weeds.
  1. s-metolachlor – (Brawl, Medal, Dual II Magnum, Brawl II, Cinch, Medal II)                       $10-28/A
  • 1-1.6 pts/A applied EPPS, SPPI, PRE
  • Seed Safener Required.
  • Good control of several annual grasses.
  1. acetochlor – (Warrant)                                                                                           $13-27/A
  • 1.5-2.5 qt/A SPPI, PRE
  • Seed Safener Required.
  • Annual grass control and some broadleaves.
  1. mesotrione – (Callisto)                                                                                           $36-39/A
  • 6-6.4 oz/A EPPS or PRE
  • Good broadleaf control.
  • Add a surfactant or crop oil for control of emerged weeds


Pre-Mixes (products requiring safener (Concep) in red)

  1. dimethenamid + atrazine (Establish LITE, G-Max LITE)                                             $11-23/A
  2. s-metolachlor + atrazine (Bicep II Magnum, Charger Max ATZ, Cinch ATZ) $16-26/A
  3. saflufenacil + dimethenamid (Verdict)                                                              $18-34/A
  4. s-metolachlor + mesotrione (Zemax)                                                               $42/A
  1. s-metolachlor + mesotrione + atrazine (Lumax)                                                           $51/A

Still “Free” Nitrogen for Grain Sorghum Production: Revisiting Soil Profile N

This tip was provided by:

Calvin Trostle, Extension Agronomy, Lubbock, 806-746-6101,


Still “Free” Nitrogen for Grain Sorghum Production:  Revisiting Soil Profile N

It has been almost five years since I first mentioned this topic in Sorghum Tips. What has changed?—Nothing! Across Texas crop consultants, producers, AgriLife staff, etc. continue growing awareness of the potential for accumulating nitrate-nitrogen (NO3-N) in the soil. This nitrogen has value for your sorghum and other crops. “Profile N” is readily available nitrogen accumulating below standard soil sampling depths (most often 6”). This accumulation is due to over fertilization (or underutilization in years when production is sub-par) with N, and the majority of the time producers are not aware of the presence of this N in the soil. Historically this N is not accounted for in supplying crop nutrient requirements, but it should be—all of it!

The level of N accumulation can vary greatly due to fertilization practices, downward percolating moisture from rains which carries the soluble and mobile nitrate, soil type, etc. Sometimes substantial N is found even below 3’ in the soil, but only deep rooted crops can tap that N. Texas A&M AgriLife’s Soil, Water, and Forage Testing Lab has updated their “Profile Soil Sample Information Form” (SP17) for 2017. This form pairs your standard 0-6” soil sample (analyzed for multiple nutrients including N, P, etc.; routine analysis is still only $10, the same as in 2012) with a second soil sample from below 6” to as deep as 24”. This paired soil sample is analyzed for nitrate-N only, $4/sample. The submitter marks the depth so a proper calculation of nutrient requirements can be made by the soil test lab

Is profile nitrate-nitrogen down to 24” deep 100% available to grain sorghum?

Yes. Even slightly deeper N is largely available. The Profile Soil Sample form for N credits all nitrate N at 6-24” to your crop requirement thus reducing fertilizer costs. Extension recommends that producers include at least some profile soil N sampling to establish whether there might be deeper N present.

Some producers disagree with crediting all nitrate-N in the 6-24” range to grain sorghum. In Texas across the state for different soil types, and yes, different crops, for all practical purposes you can credit all measured nitrate-N to your crop requirement. Many producers have never heard this. When I conduct Extension educational programs on this topic, I ask for a show of hands “How many of you think you can fully credit 100% of soil nitrate-N in the top 24” to your crop requirement?” (I deliberately emphasize ‘fully’ and ‘100%’). Normally about 10% of attendees say you can, and 20-30% say you can’t, and the rest are sitting on the fence. Yes, as noted above, “for all practical purposes…” Perhaps a producer is truly uncomfortable with this idea; if so, then credit 2/3 or ¾ of you soil test profile N—this is still a potentially significant cost savings. What do other states do in their soil testing labs do? They generally credit 100%, and in fact several states including Kansas now recommend a 24” soil sampling for all nutrient analyses.

The soil test lab I prefer doesn’t offer a profile soil test for N. What do I do?

Most labs in fact don’t have a separate form for nitrate-N only soil profile test. If you like the concept you can still submit your samples to that lab, just fill out one form for each sample then you will need to total the sum of nitrate-N. for all samples (above 3’) by your own hand.

The current Texas A&M AgriLife Extension Profile Soil Sample form is found at

Grain Sorghum Hybrid Trials & Selection for 2017

I attended the Amarillo Farm Show on Wednesday. I have about 10 seed company catalogs that include grain sorghum hybrids. At first glance you would not know where to begin if you didn’t have your own track record of preferred grain sorghum hybrids—there are almost two dozen hybrids listed in some catalogs. Many of these catalogs are “national” in that they list all hybrids the company markets, including what you might plant in Nebraska, Missouri, Georgia, or Texas, for example. In most cases, however, I visited with company representatives and have circled in my catalogs their primary choices for dryland and irrigated hybrids for my region.

Texas A&M AgriLife Research is publishing every week additional 2016 grain sorghum hybrid trial results here (also note the “Archive” link for results from 2015 and previous years on the same page). None of the current trials have any data on sugarcane aphid observations.

As producers across Texas consider grain sorghum hybrids for 2016, your recent experience will color greatly the value you place on potential grain sorghum SCA tolerance. Producers in South & Central Texas have not had as much trouble the past two years as was probably feared after the first two years that SCA appeared. In contrast, in much of the Texas Panhandle and the northwest South Plains, growers in 2016 faced tremendous damage in this area of the state where SCA arrived the latest.

For hybrid trials that various states set up to test hybrid performance in the presence of sugarcane aphid, there are several types of data that you may find as these trials are published over the next 2 to 3 months. This data will include:

  • SCA counts of aphids per leaf (including lower and upper leaves) and a reporting of how soon initial SCA infestation occurred and perhaps SCA counts at different growth stages throughout the season.
  • Reductions in stand of younger plants if SCA killed seedlings (although it is likely it can’t be assumed that all trials had uniformity of planted seed having a seed treatment insecticide; most hybrids planted in these trials probably do).
  • SCA damage ratings (likely on a scale of 0 to 9 or 0 to 10) taken later in the season.
  • Percentage of lodged plants.
  • Head exsertion (how far the heads emerged past the flag leaf; heavily damaged plants may not have the energy to push the head out very well).
  • Yield—but not just regular yield. Yield is the bottom line, and the best trial results will compare yield of grain sorghum hybrids with and without SCA control. This enables comparisons of the total impact of SCA on hybrid performance.

Watch for trial reports that were conducted specifically to evaluate hybrid performance in response to sugarcane aphid. Texas A&M AgriLife has several forthcoming trials, and we will be interested in the same types of trials from surrounding states. United Sorghum Checkoff Program’s Dr. Brent Bean will be compiling numerous reports across states. I will let you know when these reports are reported.

A note about Sugarcane Aphid in South Texas—Robert Bowling’s 2016 Summary

Dr. Robert Bowling, Texas A&M AgriLife Extension entomologist, Corpus Christi, published his season-ending newsletter on Monday, Nov. 28. He discusses the “head scratcher” observations, e.g., sudden collapse of numerous SCA populations observed in many fields in 2016, as well as a potential fungal pathogen of the sugarcane aphid. See his most recent “Rolling with Bowling” post here.

Page 3 of 12«12345»10...Last »